Continuous advocacy for reforms preferable to protests

1 month ago 55

In recent years, Nigeria has witnessed a surge in protests, with citizens taking to the streets to voice their discontent over issues ranging from police brutality to economic hardship and widespread corruption. The #EndSARS movement, which called for the disbandment of the Special Anti-Robbery Squad, is perhaps the most notable example, galvanising thousands and drawing international attention. While protests serve as a powerful tool for expressing dissent and demanding change, the question remains: Is protest the best way to end bad governance in Nigeria?

Protests are a fundamental aspect of any democratic society, providing a platform for citizens to express their grievances and hold their leaders accountable. In Nigeria, where bad governance has become a chronic issue, protests have often been the catalyst for national discourse. They bring critical issues to the forefront, mobilise public opinion, and can lead to tangible changes in policy or leadership.

However, protests can also have limitations. They can be met with violent repression, as seen during the #EndSARS protests when security forces clashed with demonstrators, resulting in the loss of lives. Moreover, while protests can raise awareness, they do not always translate into long-term solutions or systemic change. The cycle of protest followed by temporary concessions often leads to disillusionment among citizens, who may feel that their voices are not truly heard or respected.

To address the deep-seated issues of bad governance in Nigeria, a multifaceted approach is necessary. Rather than relying solely on protests, citizens and civil society organisations must engage in sustained advocacy and strategic actions that promote accountability and reform.

Strengthening institutions is crucial for good governance. This includes reforming the judiciary to ensure it is independent and effective, enhancing the capacity of law enforcement agencies to uphold human rights, and implementing mechanisms to curb corruption at all levels of government.

Educating citizens about their rights and responsibilities is vital. A well-informed populace is more likely to engage in constructive dialogue with their leaders and demand accountability through peaceful means. Civic education should be integrated into school curricula and community programmes to foster a culture of active citizenship.

Citizens should be encouraged to participate actively in political processes beyond protests. This includes voting in elections, holding elected officials accountable through advocacy, and even running for office. Grassroots movements can help identify and support candidates who prioritise good governance and transparency.

Establishing platforms for dialogue between citizens and government officials can facilitate understanding and collaboration. Forums that allow citizens to voice their concerns directly to policymakers can lead to more responsive governance.

Engaging with international organisations can provide additional pressure on the Nigerian government to uphold democratic principles and human rights. Partnerships with global advocacy groups can amplify local voices and bring attention to issues of governance.

In conclusion, while protests have played a significant role in highlighting the issues of bad governance in Nigeria, they should not be viewed as the sole solution. Instead, a comprehensive strategy that combines civic engagement, institutional reforms, education, dialogue, and international support is essential for fostering sustainable change.

As Nigerians continue to demand accountability from their leaders, it is imperative that they also seek to build a robust framework for governance that prioritises the rule of law, human rights, and public welfare. Only through collective efforts can the cycle of bad governance be broken, paving the way for a more just and equitable society.