Kaduna ex-Commissioners dismiss N423b theft allegation against El-Rufai

El-Rufai. Photo/facebook/nasirelrufai

Former members of the Kaduna State Executive Council (2015 – 2023) have said there is no iota of truth in the alleged N423 billion money laundering allegation against former governor of the state, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai.

The former commissioners, who addressed the press in Abuja yesterday, said the report by the State House of Assembly is the outcome of a process motivated by malice and conducted with patent unfairness.
[ad]
Recall that the assembly, in a document titled “Report of Ad-hoc Committee on Loans, Financial Transactions, Contractual Liabilities and Other Related Matters,” alleged financial mismanagement, money laundering and abuse of office by El-Rufai’s administration.

But the ex-commissioners who served under the former governor, dismissed the report and the processes associated with it in their entirety.

Led by the former Commissioner for Environment, Alhaji Jafaru Ibrahim Sani, other former executive council members, who briefed the press on the matter on behalf of others, included former Commissioner for Human Services and Social Development, Hafsat Mohammed Baba; former Commissioner for Planning and Budget Commission, Umar Yusuf Aboki, and former Chief of Staff, Bashir Saidu.

They said they have not received a certified copy of the report, which has been circulating on social media since its adoption on June 5, 2024, despite repeated requests.

They said: “In spite of repeated requests and inquiries from us and various colleagues of ours, no certified true copy of this report has been released to any persons who were mentioned in the report or who testified before the Ad-hoc Committee in response to its summons or who were indicted (some without ever being summoned or heard by the Ad Hoc Committee).

“In the light of non-release to us of the certified copy of the report, this statement relies on the document referred to above that began circulating on social media shortly after the Kaduna State House of Assembly adopted the said document on Wednesday, June 5, 2024.”

They defended the administration’s record, highlighting achievements in modernising the state, developing human capital, expanding infrastructure and improving business standing under the leadership of El-Rufai.

The former commissioners specifically addressed allegations of money laundering and misappropriation of funds, stating that no evidence supports these claims and that the same Assembly previously accepted the state’s audited accounts.

They noted that due process was followed in securing loans, including a USD 350 million World Bank loan used for the state’s development, which received a satisfactory rating from the World Bank upon completion.

They also clarified the state’s foreign loan exposure and refuted exaggerated claims about loans attributed to the El-Rufai administration.

They emphasised that many projects commissioned by the current administration were initiated or funded by the previous government, questioning the logic of criticising loan-taking while benefiting from the projects those loans funded.

They affirmed that all contract awards followed due process, in line with the Kaduna State Public Procurement Authority Law, and dubbed the Assembly’s report as a poorly calculated attempt at legislative character assassination.

“We affirm the integrity of the administration in which we served the people of Kaduna State between May 2015 and May 2023 under the leadership of Malam Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai.
[ad]
“In eight years, this administration in which we were greatly privileged to serve impacted Kaduna State with innovations that accelerated the modernisation of the state, prioritised human capital development, expanded its infrastructure, improved its business standing, promoted equality of opportunity.

“During Malam El-Rufai’s tenure, his administration, in spite of our state’s public safety challenges, was undoubtedly established as one of the best in Nigeria,” they added.

They criticised the report as malicious, unfair and filled with inaccuracies, vowing to defend their reputations against what they described as an attempt to smear them.

“We dismiss this report and the processes associated with it in their entirety. The report is the outcome of a process motivated by malice and conducted with patent unfairness. It is irredeemably riddled with falsehood, predetermined conclusions and misrepresentation,” they alleged.

The former commissioners expressed their commitment to due process and transparency, and their readiness to address any substantiated claims legally and ethically.
[ad]

Post Views: 49