- President Bola Tinubu's minister for women's affairs, Barrister Uju Kennedy-Ohanenye, has shown more passion and zeal since her resumption into the office over a year ago
- However, Barrister Kennedy-Ohanenye's passion and zeal for her job have been marred by some controversies and criticism
- Top of the criticism is her move to disrupt some events, which she claimed were not authorised by her ministry
Barrister Uju Kennedy-Ohanenye, President Bola Tinubu's minister of women's affairs, have displayed more zeal and passion for her job since he resumed the role over a year ago. However, these are carried out with some controversies and criticism.
According to Daily Trust, the ministry exists because of the country's gender equity gaps and the need to meet the multidimensional demands on women in the global world.
Below are some of the controversies surrounding Uju Kennedy-Ohanenye:
UNICAL sexual harassment case
Kennedy-Ohanenye faced backlash for threatening to jail the victim of a sexual harassment case at the University of Calabar if they were found to be lying.
Many saw this as bullying and criticized her for not letting the investigation run its course. She later apologized for her comments
Child exploitation statement
At the Anambra Investment Summit, Kennedy-Ohanenye suggested employing children to produce everyday items like toothpicks and sanitary pads to boost urban development.
This sparked outrage, with many accusing her of endorsing child labour. She later clarified that she never advocated for using children to produce toothpicks.
Threat to sue the United Nations
Kennedy-Ohanenye threatened to sue the United Nations over alleged mismanagement of funds intended for Nigerians.
However, this exposed her misunderstanding of international law, as the UN enjoys immunity from lawsuits.
Disrupting ‘unauthorised’ events
The minister has been seen disrupting at least two events, citing a lack of approval from her ministry. The incidents were captured in viral video clips, sparked mixed reactions among Nigerians.
Some backed her stance, seeing it as a move to highlight the misuse of funds on events with no direct impact on women's lives. Others, however, criticized her aggressive approach, labelling it disruptive and potentially counterproductive ².
PAY ATTENTION: Сheck out news that is picked exactly for YOU ➡️ find the “Recommended for you” block on the home page and enjoy!
Source: Legit.ng